91
« Last post by Fenris on March 17, 2025, 02:59:55 PM »
Oh, would you like to moderate Fenris??? What section of the board my friend?
Ahh just fooling around. I don't think it would be appropriate to have a Jewish moderator on a Chirstian message board. I love all you guys though.
92
« Last post by Sojourner on March 17, 2025, 11:34:38 AM »
Welcome, Davy! 
93
« Last post by Kingfisher on March 17, 2025, 08:35:03 AM »
Howdy fellow southerner!
94
« Last post by Kingfisher on March 17, 2025, 08:33:21 AM »
Howdy and welcome back!
95
« Last post by davy on March 17, 2025, 07:49:10 AM »
Which direction will Russia go, particularly in light of the Gog prophecy? It's a darn good question. I have a bit unusual perspective, though I got my ideas from others. I think the Beast Empire will be European Civilization uniting East and West, including Russia and the US, and all of Europe. However, until that happens Russia and the US are like the thumbs on left and right hands, and they seek the sphere that enables them to be dominant in the roles they play. ....
Old thread, but still very important for today. I highly recommend a book named New Lies For Old by Anatoliy Golitsyn. He was an ex-KGB colonel who defected to the U.S. in the 1960's. That book he wrote in 1984, but in it he predicted that in the Soviet's 3rd Phase of their long-range disinformation strategy against the west, they might allow the Berlin Wall to come down. That happened in 1989-1990. You can find a facsimile copy of the book on archive.org. Golitsyn wrote another book in 1990 called The Peristroika Deception, continuing revelations about the Communist's long-range disinformation strategy against the west. He even quoted Gorbachev when he was asked after the Berlin Wall was taken down, if he still believed in the plan for world Communism, and Gorbachev said definitely yes. So Golitsyn basically said the 'cold war' and Communism being over is nothing but a HOAX and part of the Russian Communist's long-range disinformation strategy against the West. In Golitsyn's book, he even mentions how Russian held religious summits inviting Christian pastors from the West are designed to plant disinformation in the Churches in the West to preach their idea of 'social religion' and not 'revealed religion', an idea that ex-FBI agent Cleon Skousen also mentioned in his book The Naked Communist.And one of the goals Golitsyn said that was part of the Soviet long-range disinformation strategy is the plan for a one-Socialist Europe, from the Urals to the Atlantic. Thus I believe world Communism is being used as a 'tool' to bring in the coming one-world beast government and kingdom. It simply ain't over, because the fat lady has not sung yet. And if one reads Georgetown history professor Carrol Quigley's 1960's book Tragedy and Hope, one will find that he says "the establishment" often works with Communism and has no problem doing so. Quigley himself was an "establishment" insider, as even ex-President Bill Clinton was taught under him at Georgetown University, and Clinton endorsed Quigley in his inaugural speech.
96
« Last post by davy on March 17, 2025, 07:26:54 AM »
At Zechariah 12:10-14, it is for after... the battle on the "day of the Lord", i.e., Armageddon when the nations of Ezek.38 come up against Jerusalem. And then those Jews of Romans 11 which Apostle Paul said God had blinded, will have that spiritual blindness removed, and they shall see Jesus Christ as He is, and will mourn for Him.
That nation list of Ezekiel 38 does not have any... Christian nation on it. So scratch ideas from Christ's enemies that try to claim the U.S. or any Christian nation will be part of that. Instead, Ezekiel 38 points to the nations of Russia, Persia (Iran, Iraq), Gomer (old Soviet satellite countries), Libya, and Togarmah (old Cappodicia, now the area of Turkey).
The Communist leaders of Russia I believe represent Jacob's unbelieving brother Esau who profaned his birthright from God by trading it for a bowl of beans. The prophecy in Genesis of the blessing given Esau by his father Isaac was that his place would be 'far away' from those things that were given to his brother Jacob (KJV has a scribe error on that Scripture). And thus Russia fits the bill, plus... it is obvious the 'radical' Islamic nations are being supported by Russia, so the "chief" prince of Meshech of Ezek.38 strongly points to modern-day Russia.
Esau married into both the families of the Canaanites, and the family of Ishmael (Arabs). Esau is obviously jealous of Jacob for having lost the Birthright. And Ishmael, Abraham's firstborn son (but not of Sarah per God's Promise), Ishmael too is jealous of Jacob having received God's Birthright.
And many of the leftover Canaanites became bondservants to Israel, and they also may have a play against and 'within' Israel in the last days. Daniel 11 about the "vile person" for the end, which I believe is the final Antichrist at the end, that Chapter says he will come to power with "a small people". I believe that "small people" represents false leaders of Israel at the end of this world which will push that "vile person" to be king-Messiah, and trick the majority of Jews in Jerusalem at the end into believing that Messiah has come.
97
« Last post by davy on March 17, 2025, 07:02:02 AM »
I interpret Christ's Olivet discourse as covering only a 'dual prophetic' fulfillment of the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple by the Romans in 70 A.D. The rest of Christ's Olivet discourse covers Signs specifically for the end of this world, leading up to Christ's future return.
I was raised in a Preterist mainstream Protestant Church, but I didn't know then what man's doctrine of Preterism was. They believed most of Revelation was fulfilled, and only Christ's future return was still lacking. That's called Partial-Preterism. Full-Preterism is the belief that Jesus' 2nd coming already happened back in the days of His Apostles, and that it was meant in the spiritual sense only, and not as a literal bodily return. Both in my opinion are failed doctrines of men, disproven by historical fact, and by overwhelming Scripture evidences that point directly to the latter days of this world, long after 70 A.D.
In the Matt.24:32-35 Scripture about the "generation" Jesus mentioned, He is pointing to the final generation that will 'see' all those Signs of the end that He gave.
Matt 24:32-35 32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: 33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. 34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. 35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away. KJV
The condition Jesus set in the above is that "generation" will "see all these things", meaning those Signs Jesus gave in His Olivet discourse. The very last Sign Jesus gave in the Matt.24:29-31 verses is about the day of His future coming to gather His saints, and He showed that will happen AFTER... that tribulation, meaning the "great tribulation" of verse 21. So there is yet another Biblical proof that His Olivet discourse Signs are for the very end of this world, in the final generation on earth, simply because His coming to gather His saints has not happened yet today.
Some will say, but that not one stone atop another Sign Jesus gave happened already, in 70 A.D., when the Roman army destroyed Jerusalem and the 2nd temple!
I see that as a 'dual prophecy' only partially fulfilled in 70 A.D. Just as Antiochus Epiphanes in 165 B.C. took Jerusalem and sacrificed swine inside the 2nd temple at Jerusalem, and then setup an IDOL abomination in Zeus worship 'partially' fulfilled the Daniel 11:31 prophecy about the coming Antichrist, likewise the not one stone atop another prophecy for 70 A.D. served as a 'partial' fulfillment.
Per the great earthquake of Rev.11 on the 7th Trumpet, and per the Zechariah 14 Scripture about the day of Christ's future return to the Mount of Olives, with a great valley being formed, that in my opinion will complete that 'not one stone atop another' Matt.24:2 prophecy.
The only further historical events aligned with Christ's Olivet discourse other than the 70 A.D. fulfillment of the destruction of Jerusalem and the 2nd temple, are the "many" that come claiming to be Christ. There were false Christs going back in history even in that time, just as there are still many today in my era that have claimed to be Jesus Christ. So really that idea is on-going fulfillment that will culminate in the coming of the actual Antichrist at the very end of this world.
98
« Last post by davy on March 17, 2025, 06:24:26 AM »
The seven seals and how they relate to Matthew 24:
1)white horse rider(Mt 24 "many shall come in my name saying I am anointed(Christ)24:5 2)red horse rider who takes peace from the earth(wars and rumors of wars)24:6 3)Black horse rider who measures food (famines in different places)24:7 4)Pale(Green) horse rider is death and hell follows kills 1/3 with disease and war(pestilences)24:7 5)Under the alter thos who died for Jesus(they shall deliver you up)24:9 6)eathquakes,sun becomes black,moon becomes as blood(compare with Mt 24)Isa 2:19 men hiding in the holes of the rocks and in caves(joel 2:31)24:29 7)silence in heaven(because Jesus is returning with his angels and heaven is empty)24:30
What say ye?
The rider on the white horse, which is assumed to be the 1st Seal, but really doesn't say... I interpret that white horse rider to be the coming pseudo-Christ mentioned later in the Matthew 24:23-26 verses. The very first sign Jesus gave indeed was to not let any man deceive us. That I agree is the direct connection in Matt.24 to that white horse rider, however... Later on at Matt.24:23-26, the context there is actually about a 'singular' false-Christ, not many "false Christs" like the KJV translators have it. Dr. James Strong in his Strong's Exhaustive Concordance defined Greek pseudochristos there in Matt.24:24 as 'a spurious Messiah'. And the actual context of the Matt.24:23 & 26 verses is the singular tense about that false-Messiah. So what we actually have there in Matt.24 is probably where Apostle John got the idea of the coming of both a singular "antichrist" the brethren had already heard shall come, and then the "many antichrists" John said were already at work (1 John 2:18). Thus I interpret the "many" that only say they are Christ of Matt.24:5 to mean the "many antichrists" already at work. And then the later pseudochristos (spurious Messiah) that will have power to work great signs and wonders as the actual "antichrist" John said the brethren had already heard shall come. That then takes me back to the white horse rider, a singular individual mimic of how Lord Jesus returns on a white horse per Rev.19. I see that as the coming false-Messiah of Matt.24:23-26. No matter the warning of the coming false-Messiah is given at the first in Rev.6, because the link to that in Matt.24 is with Christ's very first warning to not allow any man to deceive us. This pattern of Apostle John's "antichrist" (singular false-Messiah with supernatural powers) vs. the "many antichrists" (the many who only claim to be Christ with no supernatural power), I also see in the 2 Thess.2 chapter by Paul. The "man of sin" represents the coming singular false-Messiah, and the "mystery of iniquity" Paul said was already at work represents the "many antichrists".
99
« Last post by Slug1 on March 16, 2025, 07:17:43 PM »
Hello all, I was a Mod here when bibleforums.org shutdown years ago. I was never notified about the domain name change. (from .org. to .us) I am not sure if that was by design or not. In any case, how is everyone? Who is on the leadership team now? It looks like my name was never ported over to the new database so I had to re-register. The old site just up and disappeared one day with a big ole "404" error. I am not sure what happened.
Blessings
Hey brother! Good to see ya!
100
Question on my mind: what does the first "or" mean, or how does it affect the interpretation of the text?
Col. 2:16: "Let no man therefore judge you in eating and in drinking or in respect of [i.e., in that part of] a feast, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath-days"
The Textus Receptus doesn't seem to make any distinction on the first "or". What are your thoughts? Are you intrigued by the difference between the TR and the NA26 perhaps? I would guess the NASB where it says " Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day--", it probably could be read as "Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to "food or drink", or in respect to a festival, or a new moon, or a Sabbath day... So, in the NASB, you get "food and drink" as one thing in the list as opposed to the list in the KJV which is " Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:..." all with the commas and everything with all uses of "or" by the same Greek word. Thus, meat is first in the list, drink is second, and so on.
|
Watcha doing?
by IMINXTC
Yesterday at 10:31:21 PM
|
Is free will a failed concept?
by Fenris
March 29, 2025, 10:53:14 PM
|
Gog's endtime construction?
by Fenris
March 29, 2025, 08:59:05 PM
|
The Jews will be kept safe in the Great Tribulation
by Fenris
March 29, 2025, 08:56:43 PM
|
The ECF and theosis
by shepherdsword
March 29, 2025, 01:14:01 PM
|
How to reconcile?
by shepherdsword
March 29, 2025, 01:11:46 PM
|
I was a Moderator here once before
by shepherdsword
March 29, 2025, 01:08:03 PM
|
Prayer for my wife
by ProDeo
March 29, 2025, 04:09:58 AM
|
NEW, davy from USA
by IMINXTC
March 27, 2025, 10:24:51 PM
|
The seven seals and how they relate to Matthew 24
by shepherdsword
March 25, 2025, 01:11:33 PM
|
Ash Wednesday / Lent
by Fenris
March 23, 2025, 11:06:23 AM
|
Better known as
by Cloudwalker
March 20, 2025, 12:00:11 PM
|
Blessed Are The Barren...
by Athanasius
March 20, 2025, 04:25:09 AM
|
US Presidental Election
by RabbiKnife
March 18, 2025, 08:02:52 PM
|
Plot holes
by Fenris
March 18, 2025, 04:51:14 PM
|
Zechariah 12
by Fenris
March 18, 2025, 11:52:35 AM
|
How Do I Know God Exists?
by davy
March 18, 2025, 12:05:31 AM
|
A big shout out to all of the old (and new) gang
by Kingfisher
March 17, 2025, 08:33:21 AM
|
Looking at Col. 2:16
by watchinginawe
March 16, 2025, 06:40:06 PM
|
Contents of Invitation Email I sent out yesterday to 19 former BF members
by Sojourner
March 16, 2025, 06:00:57 PM
|
|
|