Psalms 107:2 Let the redeemed of the Lord say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;

Please invite the former BibleForums members to join us. And anyone else for that matter!!!

Contact The Parson
+-

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CrimsonTide21

Pages: [1]
1
Matthew 26:42-43 King James Version

He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done. And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy.

The scene underscores Jesus' submission to the Father's will and his redemptive sacrifice. This event is central to Christian theology, representing Jesus' surrender into the hands of soldiers as part of the divine plan for humanity's redemption.

Matthew 26:53 King James Version

Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?

This passage seems to suggest that, in stating that He could summon angels through prayer to the Father, Jesus was highlighting His authority over circumstances, including the Father's already established will. This prayer would represent a channel to express, if necessary, the adjustment of the Son's will in line with the already established redemptive plan, disregarding the Father's will.

In summary, does the fact that Jesus changes the will of the Father make Him coequal to Him?
50 Jesus replied, “Do what you came for, friend.”[d]

Then the men stepped forward, seized Jesus and arrested him. 51 With that, one of Jesus’ companions reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear.

52 “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. 53 Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels? 54 But how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?”

Jesus is talking to one of his disciples and making a rather obvious point regarding the absurdity of trying to thwart His purpose by using a sword.

2
Theology / Re: Faith and peace
« on: August 23, 2024, 10:59:41 AM »
Is faith actual or only potential in the absence of peace in the inner man?

Said another way.  Can one claim to truly have faith in a then present subjective experience of anxiety or fear of loss?

I think yes.  However, I would also say it depends on what you mean by peace in the "inner man".  I do think that we are given a foundational peace and biblical joy when we have saving Faith.  If our "inner man" is troubled with doubt and anxiety, I'm not sure I would say that we have exhibited saving Faith.

Doubt, worry, depression, anxiety as a result of circumstances in our lives is the natural state of the fallen human being.  We can certainly have faith while also experiencing those struggles.  We are incapable of understanding the fullness of God's plans and that naturally leads to fear...even though we, at the same time, know that He is in control.  That said, I do think that we have the power to draw on the foundational peace of our salvation to give us poise and strength in these times. 

3
Theology / Re: Do you know then God of Jesus?
« on: August 21, 2024, 10:07:24 PM »

You still cannot refute Jesus' word of "His Father is His God".

You guys dancing around too much, friend.

God is Jesus' God. But He is also God because He is the Word of God in human form. He is the Son of God because God's Spirit caused His conception in Mary's womb, but He is God in the sense of being the Word incarnate. The Apostle John opens his Gospel presenting Jesus as He was before He was Jesus. We're told that the Word was both with God and was God from eternity (John 1:1-3), and that the Word was robed in humanity, and dwelled among men (John 1:14).

As you read these words, consider that they are my thoughts--invisible, unknown and unknowable to you. Yet, they are given substance and made manifest by my words. They are still my thoughts, but represented in a way you can know them. In a similar way, God is an invisible Spirit, unknown and unknowable to us until He manifests and reveals Himself by means of His Word. In the opening verses of Genesis, He was displeased with the watery darkness in which the earth was submerged. It was His will that there be light. He sent forth His word, and there was light.

In a similar way, Abraham was steeped in a culture of dark paganism and idolatry and the true Almighty was unknown until God revealed Himself to Abraham by speaking to Him. In the midst of the spiritual darkness, God enlightened the mind of a man by sending forth His word to reveal Himself, initiating the beginning of His work of man's redemption. This principle is beautifully depicted by the prophet Isaiah:

For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, declares the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so My ways are higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts. For just as rain and snow fall from heaven and do not return without watering the earth, making it bud and sprout, and providing seed to sow and food to eat, so My word that proceeds from My mouth will not return to Me empty, but it will accomplish what I please, and it will prosper where I send it. (Isaiah 55:8-11)

God's manifests Himself and reveals His mind, will and purpose by means of His divine word, and Jesus is the human incarnation of that word. That's why Paul calls Him "the image of the invisible God." And that's why Jesus said that to see Him was to see the Father (John 14:9). Jesus spoke of being one with God even before the world existed (John 14:5), and of being sent forth from God to accomplish His will (John 4:34; 8:42; 16;27-28; 17:8-9). Thus, Jesus, as the Word of God incarnate, is declared to have proceeded forth from God to fulfill His purpose in the same manner described by Isaiah. Moreover, He returned to Him not void, but having fully accomplished the purpose for which He was sent by means of His sacrificial death and resurrection.

So yes, God is the God and Father of Jesus. But Jesus is God as the divine Word incarnate; now and forever a temple of glorified humanity in whom dwells the Spirit of God. He has returned to the Father as depicted in Daniel 7:13, and will one day return to establish His earthly kingdom. Those who dwell in that kingdom will not see the invisible God, but will behold upon the throne the Word that reveals and manifests Him, as the king of glory.

Your post sums up my thoughts (I think LOL)

Jesus is God in the sense that he is the Word (or perfect representation, message, whatever) of God in human form.  He is clearly separate from the Father, though to say he is "not equal" doesn't really make sense in the context of who He is.  He is the perfect expression of God the Father.  God revealed Himself through the Law and the Prophets (His Word) and, ultimately, through Jesus.

Whether Jesus is God or Jesus is the Word of God, Son of God...or all of the above, whatever...His death was deemed worthy by God the Father to reconcile us to Himself.

4
Theology / Re: Is free will a failed concept?
« on: August 21, 2024, 09:30:47 PM »
Reconcile this
"God hath closed their eyes and stopped their ears lest seeing they should believe and hearing they should understand and turn to Me to save them"
Is it your contention that this passage represents those to whom God would deprive salvation? If so, it completely contradicts John 3:16 (and other verses that say salvation is freely given to all who seek it). All scripture is inspired, so if passages seem to conflict, the fault lies with our understanding.

Quote
or reconcile this
"No man cometh to Me unless the Father draw him"
The companion verse of "No man cometh to the Father except by me."

The passages refer to those whom God foreknew and predestined coming to salvation by means of His Son. Those not foreknown and predestined never belonged to Him as believers to begin with.
John 3.16 does not say for everyone who seeks it, it says for everyone who BELIEVES. The quarrel we have is how did they come to believe? of their own freewill? or did God impart the faith and [made them an offer] they could not refuse.?

The wind blows where he listeth and ye hear the sound thereof, so is everyone who is born from above
Who are born not of the flesh nor the will of the flesh but by the will of God ... why do you continue to say it was YOUR will.
What verse are you referring to in your last statement?  Are you talking about John 1:13?

5
Theology / Re: Is free will a failed concept?
« on: August 21, 2024, 09:21:33 PM »
I mean, we have passages telling us God doesn't want anyone to perish, and that salvation is freely offered to whosoever will.
There are many passages that are difficult for the Calvinist to reconcile and I've seen the explanations. Though, the most difficult to reconcile passage for the Calvinist would be Romans 5:18
Quote
Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life.
All means all in both ideas of the passage right? It is the same Greek word in both uses translated as all.
When doctrine requires one to reconcile clear, unambiguous scripture, something's definitely wrong with the doctrine.

Reconcile this
"God hath closed their eyes and stopped their ears lest seeing they should believe and hearing they should understand and turn to Me to save them"

or reconcile this
"No man cometh to Me unless the Father draw him"

I think the argument could be made that the context of that passage was specifically regarding the Jewish leaders so that his pre-ordained death could be accomplished.  The passage quotes Isaiah.  Verses 20-36 addresses non-Jews, but 37-50 is regarding Jews.  The quote is from Isaiah 6 which is specific to the Nation of Israel.  That's just my thoughts on that.

As for your second verse, I don't believe that anyone can come to Christ in Faith without being first drawn, so no argument there.  I don't see how that concludes that people don't have the choice to reject his call, though.

Pages: [1]

Recent Topics

Israel, Hamas, etc by Oscar_Kipling
Today at 03:30:05 PM

Watcha doing? by tango
Yesterday at 09:29:05 PM

In Jesus name, Amen by ProDeo
September 14, 2024, 03:18:27 AM

Is free will a failed concept? by Athanasius
August 26, 2024, 07:53:30 AM

Was the Father's will always subordinate to the Son's will? by CrimsonTide21
August 23, 2024, 11:08:52 AM

Faith and peace by CrimsonTide21
August 23, 2024, 10:59:41 AM

Do you know then God of Jesus? by CrimsonTide21
August 21, 2024, 10:07:24 PM

The Jews will be kept safe in the Great Tribulation by Slug1
August 19, 2024, 08:56:56 PM

Jesus God by Athanasius
August 13, 2024, 05:42:24 PM

I got saved by Fenris
August 13, 2024, 01:12:01 PM

How to reconcile? by Fenris
August 08, 2024, 03:08:32 PM

Problem solved by Sojourner
August 04, 2024, 05:25:26 PM

Quotable Quotes by Sojourner
August 04, 2024, 04:35:36 PM

Plea deal for the 9/11 conspirators by Fenris
August 04, 2024, 01:59:43 PM

The New Political Ethos by RabbiKnife
July 31, 2024, 09:04:59 AM

Trump shooting by Fenris
July 25, 2024, 11:50:40 AM

woke by Sojourner
July 24, 2024, 11:32:11 AM

The Rejection of Rejection by Fenris
June 27, 2024, 01:15:58 PM

Eschatology - Introduction PLEASE READ by Stephen Andrew
June 22, 2024, 05:39:59 AM

Baptism and Communion by Stephen Andrew
June 22, 2024, 05:35:20 AM

Powered by EzPortal
free website promotion

Free Web Submission