Blessed Are The Barren...

[davy]

Psalm 113 also mentions a barren woman. Maybe he's quoting that?

There's also other Bible Scripture, even in The New Testament, that mentions the idea of being with child in the positive sense, meant literally, like Matthew 1:18 about Mary pregnant with baby Jesus. Does mean that metaphor of Isaiah 54:1 applies? God forbid! of course not! And I think you well know this. So what is the problem? You well know it's about the CONTEXT of the subject. Or maybe you don't understand what context is, I don't know at this point.

To Whom It May Concern:
I do not like to argue for argument's sake, as some here do. I don't have time for silly arguments just because someone doesn't like what is being taught from God's Word as written.

Therefore, I have begun my IGNORE LIST.
And so far, Fenis is added to it, so I refuse any further communications with Fenis.

[Fenris]

There's also other Bible Scripture, even in The New Testament, that mentions the idea of being with child in the positive sense, meant literally, like Matthew 1:18 about Mary pregnant with baby Jesus. Does mean that metaphor of Isaiah 54:1 applies? God forbid! of course not! And I think you well know this. So what is the problem? You well know it's about the CONTEXT of the subject.

I'm not understanding your take on "context". The whole of chapter 54 seems to be a consolation for the barren city of Jerusalem, with the promise that her people will be returned. "For a small moment have I forsaken you, and with great mercy will I gather you... For the mountains shall depart and the hills totter, but My kindness shall not depart from you, neither shall the covenant of My peace totter," says the Lord, Who has compassion on you..." and ends with the heritage of the servants of the Lord. You're turning it into some vision of doom and gloom, of punishment for nonbelievers or whatever, things that the chapter never states, explicitly or otherwise.

To Whom It May Concern:
I do not like to argue for argument's sake, as some here do. I don't have time for silly arguments just because someone doesn't like what is being taught from God's Word as written.

Are you here to have a discussion? Or to lecture us?

Therefore, I have begun my IGNORE LIST.
And so far, Fenis is added to it, so I refuse any further communications with Fenis.

It's "Fenris", if you're going to put me on your "IGNORE LIST" you could at least spell my user name correctly.

[RabbiKnife]

If you aren’t going to be friends with Fennicus you can’t be friends with me either.  Fendrick is my JooHomey fo’ shizzle.  And he has a space laser.  Beware the space laser, nu?

Seriously Wavy Davy.   Start with the silliness and you’ll find the door.    We don’t call people names, smoke or chew or go with girls who do.

And passive aggressive “I CANT SEE YOU BECAUSE IM IGNORING YOU” works with a 3 year old but around here, meh, not so much.

When you try to debate (silly abbot, kicks are for trids ), with a conservative devout child of Abraham, you should not be surprised to get push back to your HalLindseyJohnHagee hyper dispensational interpretation of the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings or Matthew 24

Fenris be ahite…. I’m jiggy wid it.

Meshugenah shalom and far out.