Psalms 107:2 Let the redeemed of the Lord say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;

Please invite the former BibleForums members to join us. And anyone else for that matter!!!

Contact The Parson
+-

Author Topic: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity  (Read 17986 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Watchman of Naphtali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #30 on: November 06, 2023, 07:25:58 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).
« Last Edit: November 06, 2023, 07:29:29 PM by Watchman of Naphtali »

Athanasius

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 689
  • A transitive property, contra mundum
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #31 on: November 06, 2023, 07:35:32 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced.

Watchman of Naphtali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #32 on: November 06, 2023, 07:42:44 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

Athanasius

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 689
  • A transitive property, contra mundum
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #33 on: November 06, 2023, 07:45:41 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

I might have lost them in the teeny tiny 10th dimension 8)
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced.

Watchman of Naphtali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #34 on: November 06, 2023, 07:48:39 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

I might have lost them in the teeny tiny 10th dimension 8)

Is that "gaslighting" or something else?

Athanasius

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 689
  • A transitive property, contra mundum
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #35 on: November 06, 2023, 07:50:54 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

I might have lost them in the teeny tiny 10th dimension 8)

Is that "gaslighting" or something else?

Just noting you're now banned.
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced.

 

Recent Topics

Watcha doing? by Athanasius
Today at 03:34:11 AM

Genesis 1:1 by IMINXTC
October 07, 2026, 06:06:18 PM

Put me on your prayer list by Cloudwalker
October 04, 2026, 06:35:39 PM

Earthquake statistics by IMINXTC
October 04, 2026, 12:40:38 AM

The fallen tent of David. by Fenris
September 23, 2026, 04:26:01 PM

How far back does the Protestant split with Catholicism go? by Fenris
September 22, 2026, 12:34:26 PM

Is Teaching People How to Evangelize Heresy? by RabbiKnife
September 10, 2026, 08:03:33 AM

Its clear in the Bible, you do not go to Heaven or to Hell, when you die. by Fenris
August 26, 2026, 12:26:37 PM

Silly by RabbiKnife
August 26, 2026, 10:48:10 AM

Does God manifest His love in the animal world too? by Athanasius
August 17, 2026, 12:33:28 PM

Have people rightly understood the primary doctrine on Father, Son & Holy Ghost? by RabbiKnife
August 17, 2026, 06:14:15 AM

Understanding what Christ is doing in Heaven at this time. by IMINXTC
August 14, 2026, 12:03:07 PM

Do you know then God of Jesus? by Athanasius
August 14, 2026, 06:02:07 AM

Glorified body by RabbiKnife
August 14, 2026, 05:22:11 AM

The Jews will be kept safe in the Great Tribulation by Fenris
August 12, 2026, 01:42:00 PM

What is Faith? by Fenris
August 09, 2026, 12:49:58 PM

Doctrine of Original Sin by Fenris
August 06, 2026, 06:42:45 PM

Do You Know How to be Saved? by Fenris
August 06, 2026, 05:56:09 PM

Looking at Col. 2:16 by Richard Aberdeen
August 06, 2026, 05:19:32 PM

Can the law grant eternal life? by Richard Aberdeen
August 06, 2026, 05:14:31 PM

Powered by EzPortal
Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 
Support Functions of this ministry: free website promotion

Free Web Submission