Psalm 82

[Titus]

Evil as in all manner of lies about His Word. False teachers and false teaching. All open game for Christians to call out.

You and Fenris are free to argue over the text. But no one is going to go from "you have a bad text and translation" to "therefore you're a false teacher with false teaching telling lies about His Word!".

No one has.

It was a reference to post/reply #7 where Jesus was brought up as an example of using harsh, vs soft, words for correcting the Jews and their false teachings in the streets.

Jesus didn't pull any punches. That was the point. He told it like it was and Christians are told to do the same when correcting falsehood pertaining to God's Truth.

You have a real hang-up about this Bible version stuff.

A rather odd sensitivity if you ask me.

Care to explain?

Don't you worry, I read the thread before I commented. We are simply not going to play that thinly veiled antisemitic game called "correcting the Jews and their false teachings". For many reasons, but mostly because at that point, you aren't engaging in an intellectually honest discussion of the text but are dead-set on "correcting the Jew" no matter what "the Jew" says (because "the Jew" only ever puts forth false teaching. Did you know "the Jew" is a phrase used ~323 times in Mein Kampf?).

So consider this to be one of those punches-not-pulled. Engage with Fenris in good faith, or agree to disagree.

The gaslighting won't work so, feel free to surprise me with something else.

You clearly know more about jews than I do. Every time I come near the subject, you overreact.

Take a look at John 8:44 and tell me.

Harsh words or soft?

I rest my case.

Moving on.

[Athanasius]

You clearly know more about jews than I do. Every time I come near the subject, you overreact.

All one times.

Take a look at John 8:44 and tell me.

Harsh words or soft?

I rest my case.

Moving on.

Your honour, my client is a decent man trying to make a decent living and to suggest that John 8:44 be used as the rule when responding to all Jews - the rule of law, your honour - is outrageous. Your honour, the plaintiff has already confused another member for being a Jew. That's a clear indication of prejudicial motive and I move to dismiss. My client is innocent your honour.

[Titus]

You clearly know more about jews than I do. Every time I come near the subject, you overreact.

All one times.

Take a look at John 8:44 and tell me.

Harsh words or soft?

I rest my case.

Moving on.

Your honour, my client is a decent man trying to make a decent living and to suggest that John 8:44 be used as the rule when responding to all Jews - the rule of law, your honour - is outrageous. Your honour, the plaintiff has already confused another member for being a Jew. That's a clear indication of prejudicial motive and I move to dismiss. My client is innocent your honour.

Can you pretend to be somebody new for a while?

Maybe somebody who's interested in topics that are .... interesting?

The three characters you've been playing thus far are, well .... not so interesting.

I'll start a thread where we can argue about the trinity and you start posting as .... somebody NEW. 

[Athanasius]

Can you pretend to be somebody new for a while?

Maybe somebody who's interested in topics that are .... interesting?

The three characters you've been playing thus far are, well .... not so interesting.

I'll start a thread where we can argue about the trinity and you start posting as .... somebody NEW. 

I can only be the person God created me to be. I don't know what you mean by "three characters". But if you think I'm posting under this and sock puppet accounts, then that's a good one. Maybe be careful with those claims about knowing my type if you can't tell that three different people are three different people.

Hmm, maybe you're me as well

[Titus]

Can you pretend to be somebody new for a while?

Maybe somebody who's interested in topics that are .... interesting?

The three characters you've been playing thus far are, well .... not so interesting.

I'll start a thread where we can argue about the trinity and you start posting as .... somebody NEW. 

I can only be the person God created me to be. I don't know what you mean by "three characters". But if you think I'm posting under this and sock puppet accounts, then that's a good one. Maybe be careful with those claims about knowing my type if you can't tell that three different people are three different people.

Hmm, maybe you're me as well

I know who isn't three different people. 

Clicky, clicky:
https://bibleforums.us/index.php?topic=364.0;topicseen

[Athanasius]

Can you pretend to be somebody new for a while?

Maybe somebody who's interested in topics that are .... interesting?

The three characters you've been playing thus far are, well .... not so interesting.

I'll start a thread where we can argue about the trinity and you start posting as .... somebody NEW. 

I can only be the person God created me to be. I don't know what you mean by "three characters". But if you think I'm posting under this and sock puppet accounts, then that's a good one. Maybe be careful with those claims about knowing my type if you can't tell that three different people are three different people.

Hmm, maybe you're me as well

I know who isn't three different people. 

Clicky, clicky:
https://bibleforums.us/index.php?topic=364.0;topicseen

Well that would be an awful conception of the doctrine of the Trinity... Patrick (you seen those ones?).

[RabbiKnife]

Can you pretend to be somebody new for a while?

Maybe somebody who's interested in topics that are .... interesting?

The three characters you've been playing thus far are, well .... not so interesting.

I'll start a thread where we can argue about the trinity and you start posting as .... somebody NEW. 

I can only be the person God created me to be. I don't know what you mean by "three characters". But if you think I'm posting under this and sock puppet accounts, then that's a good one. Maybe be careful with those claims about knowing my type if you can't tell that three different people are three different people.

Hmm, maybe you're me as well

I TOLD you that when you post, you have to keep Little Johnny locked in the closet and to not let Aunt Gertrude say anything out loud.  Most people can't handle the whole "plural pronouns is correct" thing when talking with potential multiple personalities.

Just sayin'.

[Athanasius]

Can you pretend to be somebody new for a while?

Maybe somebody who's interested in topics that are .... interesting?

The three characters you've been playing thus far are, well .... not so interesting.

I'll start a thread where we can argue about the trinity and you start posting as .... somebody NEW. 

I can only be the person God created me to be. I don't know what you mean by "three characters". But if you think I'm posting under this and sock puppet accounts, then that's a good one. Maybe be careful with those claims about knowing my type if you can't tell that three different people are three different people.

Hmm, maybe you're me as well

I TOLD you that when you post, you have to keep Little Johnny locked in the closet and to not let Aunt Gertrude say anything out loud.  Most people can't handle the whole "plural pronouns is correct" thing when talking with potential multiple personalities.

Just sayin'.

I mean, we can't disagree with that can we?