Psalms 107:2 Let the redeemed of the Lord say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;

Please invite the former BibleForums members to join us. And anyone else for that matter!!!

Contact The Parson
+-

Author Topic: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity  (Read 9357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Watchman of Naphtali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #30 on: November 06, 2023, 07:25:58 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).
« Last Edit: November 06, 2023, 07:29:29 PM by Watchman of Naphtali »

Athanasius

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 334
  • A transitive property, contra mundum
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #31 on: November 06, 2023, 07:35:32 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced.

Watchman of Naphtali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #32 on: November 06, 2023, 07:42:44 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

Athanasius

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 334
  • A transitive property, contra mundum
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #33 on: November 06, 2023, 07:45:41 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

I might have lost them in the teeny tiny 10th dimension 8)
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced.

Watchman of Naphtali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #34 on: November 06, 2023, 07:48:39 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

I might have lost them in the teeny tiny 10th dimension 8)

Is that "gaslighting" or something else?

Athanasius

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 334
  • A transitive property, contra mundum
    • View Profile
Re: coexistent modalism as the true Trinity
« Reply #35 on: November 06, 2023, 07:50:54 PM »
So you're trying to offer a new doctrine of the Trinity, and not Binitarian, Sabellianism, or "coexistent Modalism" at all? Some just really, strange, doctrine of the Trinity where Jesus is teeny tiny?
I think it's awesome that 2,000 years after Jesus lived, people are still inventing new theologies about him.

I mean I have no problems with that in principle. Especially if they're novel and have notions like teeny tiny Jesus.

Now you appear to be mocking...

I assume that it is just for the fun of it?

Maybe you should seriously consider this doctrine.

No. You see, fun considerations are an interesting way to interrogate a doctrine. If our future selves also exist outside of time (do you think they do?), then we already exist outside of time, and that has certain implications when it comes to theory of time, and salvation, etc.

The teeny tiny Jesus stuff was in jest, but that's because the 10th dimension is teeny tiny and it's funny imagery. But like, I want to know exactly what you're saying. So, how far does this notion of atemporality extend?

In teaching that the Son is Omnipresent from everlasting to everlasting (exists throughout time and eternity).

I know. I'm asking about people and how far this notion extends.

I have no teaching on the saints ascending to exist outside of time (I believe that the Bible is silent on the issue).

Unless you have scripture to bring to bear on the equation...

I might have lost them in the teeny tiny 10th dimension 8)

Is that "gaslighting" or something else?

Just noting you're now banned.
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced.

 

Recent Topics

US Presidental Election by IMINXTC
Yesterday at 07:47:33 PM

Watcha doing? by IMINXTC
Yesterday at 04:36:27 PM

Antichrist by tango
May 16, 2025, 09:58:29 PM

Question for Fenris by RabbiKnife
May 15, 2025, 01:09:22 PM

There is a new Pope by teddyv
May 14, 2025, 12:14:40 PM

Was the Father's will always subordinate to the Son's will? by Fenris
May 13, 2025, 11:28:36 AM

Looks like bibleforums.org has been hacked and harbors a malicious script by teddyv
May 13, 2025, 11:00:24 AM

The Prophecy of the Popes or the "Pope is dead, long live the Pope" by Fenris
May 10, 2025, 10:12:24 PM

Continuity Gaffes by Fenris
May 09, 2025, 03:01:58 PM

Plot holes by Cloudwalker
May 09, 2025, 12:00:25 PM

Anybody seen "The House of David" series? by Sojourner
May 08, 2025, 02:13:35 PM

Better known as by Sojourner
May 05, 2025, 11:35:49 AM

Pray for my brother by Kingfisher
May 02, 2025, 08:06:37 AM

The time gaps in the life of a prophet by Fenris
April 27, 2025, 11:45:10 AM

US National Debt by Fenris
April 24, 2025, 01:22:48 PM

Is free will a failed concept? by Athanasius
April 20, 2025, 12:36:15 PM

[Lord] You were beautiful by Billy Evmur
April 17, 2025, 07:20:43 PM

The Jews will be kept safe in the Great Tribulation by Billy Evmur
April 16, 2025, 03:51:04 AM

Song of Ruth by Billy Evmur
April 15, 2025, 07:22:08 AM

Is Answers in Genesis becoming a cult? by Fenris
April 06, 2025, 12:14:10 PM

Powered by EzPortal
Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 
Support Functions of this ministry: free website promotion

Free Web Submission