Psalms 107:2 Let the redeemed of the Lord say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;

Please invite the former BibleForums members to join us. And anyone else for that matter!!!

Contact The Parson
+-

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mr.E

Pages: [1]
1
Eschatology / Re: King of the North and King of the South.
« on: May 29, 2026, 07:58:54 PM »
Do you know where the starting date is recorded in Scripture?

445 B.C.: This view dates the clock to the spring of 445 B.C., when Artaxerxes granted Nehemiah permission to rebuild the walls of the city. This leads to the arrival and crucifixion of the Messiah at the end of the 69 weeks, followed by a gap before the final 7-year period.

To think I picked the date is absurd.

2
Eschatology / Re: King of the North and King of the South.
« on: May 26, 2026, 08:55:44 PM »
I didn't find Daniel particularly difficult. Once you know the history of these empires Daniel's prophecy was a breathe of fresh air. Many of the details align with the history of each empire. The exact date that Daniel was told about is one of the most amazing apologetic prophecies of all. There is no human explanation for how Daniel's prophecy brings the end of the 483 years on Monday of the week Jesus is crucified. He was killed on April 3 33 AD and this date has been confirmed by many liberals.

3
Theology / Re: Acts 13.48
« on: May 25, 2026, 06:38:22 PM »
Salvation has no relationship to election. The nation of Israel was a chosen nation but surely not all Jews were saved. Jesus elected the 12 disciples and said that one of them is the devil. Not all disciples were saved. Election is to be placed in a privileged position in the plan of God, not including salvation since believing the Gospel message is optional.

A serious student in my definition is one who has disciplined himself to study and understand the original language of NT. He must have a very strong grasp of NT Greek.

4
Theology / Re: Am I missing somthing? Redeemed
« on: May 25, 2026, 06:04:30 PM »
2 Peter 2:1

But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves.

To buy a person or group of people is what redeemed means. Back in first century, they sold slaves in the market place, when one is bought/redeemed out of the Market. They were able to be a free man. Here they use its simplified bought! Although several modern translation translate this as redeemed.

5
Theology / Re: Can the law grant eternal life?
« on: May 16, 2026, 05:23:26 PM »
The Mosaic Law was never intended to provide a way of salvation.

Salvation was by faith in the God that has revealed Himself. Remember, Romans 1 informs us what people know about the Creator. All people are condemned so God can be merciful to all. See verses 19 and 20:

19 For the truth about God is known to them instinctively; God has put this knowledge in their hearts. 20 Since earliest times men have seen the earth and sky and all God made, and have known of his existence and great eternal power. So they will have no excuse when they stand before God at Judgment Day.


God took total responsibility for Adam and Eve's original sin. But, sin has no relationship to eternal condemnation, the LOF. Nobody is sent to hell for personal sins. All sins have been paid for by Christ on the Cross. In fact, God has redeemed all unbelievers, and because sins have nothing to do with eternal condemnation, His redeeming them does not ipso facto mean they are saved.

You can call it original sin or actual sin, the bottom like is that God has provided the way for all people to be saved, in fact, that is God's desire that all people will be saved.

6
Theology / Re: Acts 13.48
« on: June 18, 2025, 11:12:47 PM »
Instead of posting the Romans 9.22 article just because you can, perhaps you should ask, why? This and your other threads are very cold opens, and they follow from posting the same content on other forums over the last I don't know, at least 8 months?


I post all my articles to various forums in hopes that I run across one person who can interact with the content of my postings in a way that a serious bible student could respond. So far, on all the forums I visit, it is very rare to find someone who has studied his butt off, and wants to know the truth just as I do.

7
Theology / Re: Acts 13.48
« on: June 16, 2025, 09:46:25 AM »

Who is “we” and when did “we” discuss Romans?

My bad, I think I got this from one of my Sunday School classes years ago. If I can find the first part of the Roman's article, I will post it.

8
Theology / Am I missing somthing? Redeemed
« on: June 16, 2025, 09:34:07 AM »
Can someone explain to me how unbelievers, which the Bible says, they have all been redeemed. Is this a contradiction?

9
Theology / how to pray
« on: June 14, 2025, 04:13:27 PM »
I have a few comments on this often-referenced verse.

John 14

“And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Father may be
glorified in the Son. If you ask me anything in my name, I will do it.”

Many have laid claim to this passage as a promise from Christ that He will
answer our prayers, if we make the requests “in His name.” And no matter how
you twist this verse, you can not get away from the simple formula herein
prescribed: Ask in my name, and it’s yours!

Not only that, but we are told that “whatever” we ask, He will do it. In
fact, it is even repeated, “anything” you ask in His name, He will do it.
Are there no limits? And is asking “in my name” a magical formula or
incantation that we simply invoke to get anything we want?

Here, let me give it a whirl:

Lord, I would like a million dollars to be put into my mailbox immediately,
preferably cash! And I make this request “in Christ’s name.”

This is better than having a genie in a lamp. All you have to do is just add
“in my name” to any number of requests (unlike the genie, he only gives you
three), and presto, you got it. And what if you lose the lamp; you’re out of
luck. Here, all you have to do is remember the magic formula. How simple!

Wait one minute; I’ll be right back…

I’m back. Sorry for that brief delay.

Maybe I better take a look at this verse a little closer, since I just
checked the mailbox and did not get my promised million dollars. I
distinctly remember saying “in Christ’s name.” What gives?

I personally find the Apostle John borderline genius. If you ever take
Greek, you will be told that the easiest Gospel to read in Greek is John’s.
Without a doubt, this is true, but not because he was some unlearned
fisherman using simple words. Rather, because he had the ability to reduce
the complex to the simple, and better than any other Gospel writer (in my
opinion). He just had the ability to say so much with few words.

His opening verses for this Gospel are nothing short of brilliant. You could
literally study these verses for a lifetime!

So, what does John mean when he says that all we have to do is ask “in His
name” and our prayers will be answered?

I think if we take the first and last word of this prepositional phrase it
may become more apparent. It is like John to pack so much meaning in simple
phrases. Unpacking the meaning of his simple, yet deep, phrases is one of my
favorite things to do in this life!

Let’s begin by looking at the preposition: “in”

Like many Greek prepositions, this preposition must be interpreted based on
grammatical, syntactical, and contextual indicators.

The preposition John chooses here is the most frequently used preposition in
the New Testament. (If you ever get bored one day, you can count them; it is
used 2,752 times in the Greek New Testament.) Quite naturally, a preposition
used this often would have a variety of meanings.  Just to give you an idea,
here are a few of the ways it can be translated, depending on the various
indicators:

This list is pretty much the same list you will find in any Greek 101 book.

Spatial/Sphere: in the sphere of
Temporal:   within, when, while, during
Association:   in association with
Cause:   because of
Instrumental:   by means of
Reference:   with reference to
Manner:   with, in this manner
Standard:   according to the standard of, in accordance with

Greek scholars compile this information by studying thousands of uses of
this preposition. They have to categorize each use and consolidate as much
as possible. After examining literally thousands of Greek writings, the
above categories emerged. It is a tedious process, but a relatively simple
one.

If we put other related verses together with this one, we see that Christ is
assuring the believers that their prayers will be answered just as His were.
If we pray as Christ did, our prayers will be answered. But there is the
rub. Our prayers have to be patterned after Christ’s. The things that Christ
prayed for are the things we should pray for. The desires Christ had, we should have. So, there are some limits put on our prayers. We can ask for “anything” as long as Christ Himself asked for it first. Based on the development of this context, John uses the Standard use of the
preposition here. We could actually translate this with more precision: in
accordance with. Our prayers should be in accordance with the prayers of
Christ.

The other uses are eliminated by John based on the context. For example,
Christ is clearly not saying that our prayers will be answered BECAUSE we
pray (Cause use), nor is He implying that our prayers will be answered WHILE
we pray (Temporal use). Often times, the context alone eliminates most
options. But the Standard use here seems intuitive, since the context leaves
little room for doubt.

The next item to consider is the word “name.” After a brief look at this,
you will see why I have translated the preposition “in accordance with.”

In today’s English, we use this word “name” in a number of ways. Here are a
few examples:

My name is Joe.
Those mean boys called me names.
We are a Christian Nation in name only.
I am making this donation in her name, since she can not be here.

Languages are remarkably alike. Thousands of years ago, the Greeks had
multiple uses for the word “name” just as we do today. The reason is obvious
enough: languages simply convey ideas, and many ideas are common to all.

So let’s return to the verse and expand it a bit.

“If you ask me anything in accordance with my NAME, I will do it.”

In English, this sounds a bit awkward. We don’t use this concept (my name)
as the Greeks did. Something seems missing, and indeed it is.

In the New Testament, the word for “name” is used with noticeable diversity.
Here are a few examples of how the word “name” can be used:

Luke 1
His NAME is John.

Eph. 1
This power he exercised in Christ when he raised him from the dead and
seated him at his right hand in the heavenly realms far above every rule and
authority and power and dominion and every NAME that is NAMED.

(Here you get the sense that the idea is Christ was raised far above the
most prominent of men and women, even those of noble and great reputation.)

Matt. 6
Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy NAME (pardon the King James
English).

John 12
Father, glorify your NAME.

(Here, as in many places, the word “name” refers to the sum total of all
that God is. “Glorify Who and What you are, Father,” is an alternate
translation. The word “name” has this inherent meaning.)

Matt. 18
And whoever welcomes a child like this in my NAME welcomes me.

Acts 3
But Peter said, “I have no silver or gold, but what I do have I give you. In
the NAME of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, stand up and walk!

(Here the word “name” refers to the “authority” of Christ. You could
translate this: “I stand here on the AUTHORITY of Jesus Christ of Nazareth,
and command you to stand up and walk!”)

Perhaps looking at a Greek dictionary will help to paint a more clear
picture of this multifaceted word.

Here are just some of the meanings found in a Greek dictionary for the word
“name:”

1. all that a name implies or covers
2. authority
3. character
4. rank
5. majesty
6. power
7. excellence

My preferred meaning is not listed above. I believe the word “legacy”
captures the Greek word used in John 14 better than any of those above. With
the above in mind, notice how this verse is expanded in the following
translation:

“And I will do whatever you ask that is in accordance with my legacy, so
that the Father may be glorified by means of the Son. If you ask me anything
that is in accordance with my legacy, I will do it.”

In other words, Christ left us a legacy. In fact, He left us many things,
and one of those was His prayer life. So now this verse has substance. We
can actually study the prayers of Christ in order to determine if our
prayers are in accordance with the legacy left us by our Lord. If our
desires and prayers correspond to those of Christ’s, then we are in His
will, and our prayers will be answered. Christ’s prayers become the
standard. We measure our prayers against this standard.

Let’s do the same thing to the verse in Matthew 18; I think you will agree
that this is clearer:

“And whoever welcomes a child like this in accordance with my legacy,
welcomes me.” That is, whoever welcomes a child just like Christ did in His
ministry, welcomes Christ. It’s all based on the legacy left us by Christ.
Christ has left us a legacy/reputation/name of dealing with children. How did He deal with children? Deal with them the same way then! How did Christ pray? Pray the same way.


“In my name” is not a magic wand; rather, it once again reminds us that
apart from a diligent study of the life of Christ, we are simply guessing.
He left us a wonderful legacy to follow. And He alone is worthy of this
respect.

In confirmation that the above translation reflects John’s intent, we can
look at another verse written by John himself.

1 John 5

“And this is the confidence that we have before him: that whenever we ask
anything according to his will, he hears us.”

There it is again. Whatever we ask must align with God’s will. To put it
another way, only those things we ask for that correspond to God’s will, are
answered. Christ always prayed in accordance with God’s will. (There’s my
phrase again: “in accordance with.”) How do we know what God’s will is? We
have the life of Christ beautifully recorded by the gospel writers. We can
“listen” to His prayers. And if our prayers ask for those very things Christ
asked for, we have the absolute assurance that God hears us!

By way of conclusion, a brief look at the prayer life of Christ reveals that
He was driven by one motivation: that the Father would be glorified. This
would require total dependence on Him, something our sinful, sorry selves
just can’t grasp. Oh, wretched man that I am!

P. S. You don’t find Christ praying for “things.” Which lends support to the
fanciful phrase that “the best things in life are not things at all.”

10
Theology / Acts 13.48
« on: June 14, 2025, 10:43:09 AM »

Voice: Middle/Passive Acts 13.48

This chapter is closely related to the chapter in which we discussed Rom 9.22. I’d like to walk you through another example of this Middle/Passive concept because the implications of this concept are far-reaching.

Definition:       

Middle Voice: Used to emphasize the subject’s participation in the verbal process

Example: John 21:14 This was now the third time Jesus revealed himself (efanerwqh) to the disciples

Here, the word can be understood as either Middle or Passive. The Middle sense would reflect Christ’s participation in the decision to reveal himself at this time.

Passive Voice: Used to emphasize the subject being the recipient of the action of the verbal process

Example: John 21:14 This was now the third time Jesus was revealed (efanerwqh) to the disciples

The Passive sense could emphasize, not Christ’s decision, but the Father’s decision to reveal Christ at this time.


Chapter Summary (Of Greek)

In the previous chapter we discussed the Middle and Passive voices and how these two voices are often expressed in Greek with the same FORM. More times than not it is obvious which voice is intended. But on the occasions you have to “reach deep” to understand what the writer is communicating; it is during these times that your humility and desire to know the truth becomes evident TO YOU. I am fond of saying, “the Bible was written in such a way as to measure a person’s heart.”
 
English - The Known

English has the Active and Passive voices. We could also say that English has a Reflexive voice. A reflexive voice is pretty much what its name says: the subject both performs and receives the verb’s process.

Example: He shaved himself. (compare: He shaved ___x____.)

The reflexive pronoun (himself) is used here to show that the subject both initiated the action as well as was the recipient of the same action. In the parenthesis above, I left a blank in the sentence to demonstrate that what is expected after this verb is a direct object. And in fact, “himself” functions as the direct object in the example above.



Greek Grammar 1 - The Unknown

Let’s take a look at a few more examples of this Middle/Passive voice. One reason I am emphasizing this so much is because one’s view of the Lord can be greatly influenced by the usage of these kinds of verbs. Surely the example in Rom 9.22 is no small matter.

We will begin with the same example used above in John. Let’s get the Greek in front of us.


touto   hdh     triton     efanerwqh      ihsouV  toiV     maqhtaiV
this         now   third time      was revealed        Jesus    to the      disciples 
  egerqeiV                ek    nekrwn
having raised himself       from      the dead

You will notice that “was raised” is yet another Middle/Passive verb.

Now, what is the justification for taking this as a Middle here? Look at this passage a few chapters earlier in this same gospel:

10:17 This is why the Father loves me – because I lay down my life, so that I may take it back again. 10:18 No one takes it away from me, but I lay it down of my own free will. I have the authority to lay it down, and I have the authority to take it back again. This commandment I received from my Father.”

Christ had already told his disciples that he was vested with the authority to resurrect himself. So, taking 21.14 as a Middle makes sense in light of the bigger picture.

But what about passages such as 2 Cor 4:14 which states: We do so because we know that the one who raised up Jesus will also raise us up with Jesus and will bring us with you into his presence. Or Acts 4:10 which says “let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead…”

Here we see that the Father raised Jesus. So, how can it be said that Jesus raised himself? In addition to the passage quoted in John 10, lets look at a passage in John 2, which says, “2:20 Then the Jewish leaders said to him, “This temple has been under construction for forty-six years, and are you going to raise (egereiV) it up in three days?” 2:21 But Jesus was speaking about the temple of his body. 2:22 So after he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this, and they believed the scripture and the saying that Jesus had spoken.

The verb egereiV is a Future Active Indicative, and as an Active verb, it indicates that the Jews understood Jesus to have said the he himself would raise his body.

In Luke, we have the following passage:

24:5 The women were terribly frightened and bowed their faces to the ground, but the men said to them, “Why do you look for the living among the dead? 24:6 He is not here, but has been raised (hgerqh) or has raised himself.

There is another usage of the Middle known as the Causative Middle. The idea with this usage is that the subject is the source of the action. If we take hgerqh in this sense, we could consider the following translation:

24:6 He is not here, but has caused himself to be raised (hgerqh).

Okay, let’s turn to one, final text in which the Middle voice nuance brings out the meaning in such a way as to vindicate God’s love for the whole world.


Exegetical Insight - Let’s look at a passage in the Bible regarding this lesson. (Why did we just learn about the Middle/Passive Voice?)

The passage to be analyzed in this section is Acts 13.48. Here is how it appears in the Greek.

13:48 When the Gentiles heard this, they began to rejoice and praise the word of the Lord, and all who had been appointed for eternal life believed

akouonta de  ta eqnh          ecairon           kai      edoxazon
hearing          the Gentiles    they began rejoicing      and       they began praising
ton logon   tou   kuriou   kai   episteusan
the  word     of the    Lord       and     they believed
osoi              hsan tetagmenoi       eiV   zwhn   aiwnion
as many as     had arranged themselves      for      life       eternal



Note the Perfect Middle/Passive participle tetagmenoi. Because this participle is placed along side the verb hsan, it basically means they both function together as a syntactical unit. Since it is an Imperfect tense verb and since the participle is Perfect, together they denote a Pluperfect idea. The “plu” of Pluperfect means “past.” These two words therefore combine to form a Past Perfect idea.

The participle is an inflected form of tassw. A. T. Robertson says of this verb, it means “a military term to place in orderly arrangement.” The basic meaning of this verb is to assign (a group) to a place or task, to appoint (someone) to a place or task, to decide, to arrange, or to order.

Here is how Acts 13.48 appears in the KJV:

And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.

The KJV obviously takes tetagmenoi in the Passive sense here, but I really don’t see that as a likely option. Here’s what this verse looks like if we go with the Middle sense:


When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and praised the word of the Lord; and all who positioned themselves for eternal life believed.

Or…When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and praised the word of the Lord; and all who arranged themselves to receive eternal life believed.

Just before this verse 48, notice how Luke describes the Jews and Gentiles:

13:44 On the next Sabbath almost the whole city assembled together to hear the word of the Lord. 13:45 But when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy, and they began to contradict what Paul was saying by reviling him. 13:46 Both Paul and Barnabas replied courageously, “It was necessary to speak the word of God to you first. Since you reject it and do not consider yourselves worthy of eternal life, we are turning to the Gentiles.

How did they position themselves such that they believed the gospel? Well, the Jews rejected the message; the Gentiles responded positively toward the message. When we respond positively toward the gospel, we position ourselves to believe it. The Jews rejected the gospel; the Gentiles accepted it.

Again, do you see how knowing the Greek here opens up more options? Without any training in Greek, you would have to accept the KJV’s rendition, which almost looks like God is ordaining who does and who does not believe. What is important to see here is that the idea of these people positioning themselves to either accept or reject the gospel corresponds with the rest of Scripture where we read such passages as:

1 Tim 2:3 Such prayer for all is good and welcomed before God our Savior, 2:4 since he wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.



11
When I read this title, I was sure the person who wrote it meant to say, Was the Son's will always subordinate to the Father's will.

That makes sense, but the answer can be known by intuition. Before the Trinity decided to create the universe and all the people, the Godhead was all co-equal. There was no subordination among the Members of the Trinity.

Pages: [1]

Recent Topics

Watcha doing? by Athanasius
Today at 03:34:11 AM

Genesis 1:1 by IMINXTC
October 07, 2026, 06:06:18 PM

Put me on your prayer list by Cloudwalker
October 04, 2026, 06:35:39 PM

Earthquake statistics by IMINXTC
October 04, 2026, 12:40:38 AM

The fallen tent of David. by Fenris
September 23, 2026, 04:26:01 PM

How far back does the Protestant split with Catholicism go? by Fenris
September 22, 2026, 12:34:26 PM

Is Teaching People How to Evangelize Heresy? by RabbiKnife
September 10, 2026, 08:03:33 AM

Its clear in the Bible, you do not go to Heaven or to Hell, when you die. by Fenris
August 26, 2026, 12:26:37 PM

Silly by RabbiKnife
August 26, 2026, 10:48:10 AM

Does God manifest His love in the animal world too? by Athanasius
August 17, 2026, 12:33:28 PM

Have people rightly understood the primary doctrine on Father, Son & Holy Ghost? by RabbiKnife
August 17, 2026, 06:14:15 AM

Understanding what Christ is doing in Heaven at this time. by IMINXTC
August 14, 2026, 12:03:07 PM

Do you know then God of Jesus? by Athanasius
August 14, 2026, 06:02:07 AM

Glorified body by RabbiKnife
August 14, 2026, 05:22:11 AM

The Jews will be kept safe in the Great Tribulation by Fenris
August 12, 2026, 01:42:00 PM

What is Faith? by Fenris
August 09, 2026, 12:49:58 PM

Doctrine of Original Sin by Fenris
August 06, 2026, 06:42:45 PM

Do You Know How to be Saved? by Fenris
August 06, 2026, 05:56:09 PM

Looking at Col. 2:16 by Richard Aberdeen
August 06, 2026, 05:19:32 PM

Can the law grant eternal life? by Richard Aberdeen
August 06, 2026, 05:14:31 PM

Powered by EzPortal
Support Functions of this ministry: free website promotion

Free Web Submission